• Home
  • Subscribe
  • E-Newsletter
  • Podcast
  • Media Kit
  • Contact
  • Login
Campus Rec Magazine
  • Sections
    • Columns
    • Facility Development
    • News
    • Operations
    • Programming
    • Rec of the Month
    • Staff Development
    • Well-being
    • Profiles
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Subscribe
    • E-Newsletter
    • Contact Us
  • On-Demand
    • Exclusive Interviews
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
  • Supplier Insights
    • Brand Voice
    • Supplier News
    • Supplier Voice
    • Spotlights
  • Education
    • CR Leadership Summit
    • CR Base Camp
    • Pickleball Innovators
  • Buyer’s Guide
No Result
View All Result
  • Sections
    • Columns
    • Facility Development
    • News
    • Operations
    • Programming
    • Rec of the Month
    • Staff Development
    • Well-being
    • Profiles
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Subscribe
    • E-Newsletter
    • Contact Us
  • On-Demand
    • Exclusive Interviews
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
  • Supplier Insights
    • Brand Voice
    • Supplier News
    • Supplier Voice
    • Spotlights
  • Education
    • CR Leadership Summit
    • CR Base Camp
    • Pickleball Innovators
  • Buyer’s Guide
No Result
View All Result
Campus Rec Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home News

An Inside Look at MIT’s 3-2-1 Model

Bobby Dyer by Bobby Dyer
August 28, 2018
in News, Operations
0
3-2-1 model
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Creating revenue opportunities is one of the most difficult challenges facing campus rec departments. Tim Mertz, the director of campus recreation at MIT, sought to overcome this obstacle and help his student leadership staff improve their budgeting skills along the way. The result was the 3-2-1 Model.

The 3-2-1 Model puts the onus on MIT Recreation leadership team members to come up with revenue-generating, expense-cutting ideas to be implemented throughout the fiscal year.

Below, Mertz shares in his own words his account of creating the 3-2-1 Model and the positive effect it had on his department:


The process in which the MIT Recreation leadership team sets goals for the academic year changed two years ago. At the beginning of the 2018 fiscal year, I modified the retreat and asked the team to develop their goals using a 3-2-1 model I drew up while out for a long run along the Charles River one day. The purpose of this new goal setting format was to:

  1. Teach the team how directors think about budgeting.
  2. Show them that reducing existing expense is hard.
  3. Demonstrate generating new net revenue is an increasingly important budget skill.

I knew if the 3-2-1 Model was executed correctly, it would deliver strategies and goals that would fuel a successful year.

Here is how it works. Each program area must come up with:

  • Three Producers
    • Producers must produce positive net revenue and will be measured in dollars.
  • Two Reducers
    • Reducers must reduce an existing expense and will be measured in dollars.
  • One Infuser
    • Infusers must be budget neutral and will be measured by participation/engagement/retention.

Additionally, each program area was given the flexibility to set their own targets. For example, I did not tell the team they must produce X dollars in new revenue while reducing X dollars in expense. Each team set their own targets.

They could be as aggressive as they wanted. I knew in the end, applying the 3-2-1 Model to all program areas would produce a total of nine new net revenue producing initiatives, six expense reducing initiatives and three new budget neutral initiatives that would increase participation though engagement.

When preparing to implement them in the 2018 fiscal year, the finalized 3-2-1 goals were estimated to positively impact our budget by tens of thousands of dollars. And beyond just financial performance, this 3-2-1 Model did even more. As the teams worked together for weeks preparing for the retreat, their focus on developing new revenue, reducing existing expense and increasing engagement gave them all the opportunity to enhance their executive level skills. As it turned out, the cumulative impact of the 3-2-1 goals in the 2018 fiscal was 1.5 times more than originally projected.

Looking back, the most successful producer goals were:

  1. Redeveloping the Fitness Assessment offering.
  2. Expanding hours for summer and second quarter learn-to-swim programs.
  3. Expanding the pro shop to include sports nutrition items.

The most successful reducers were:

  1. Streamline operational costs relating to subscription services.
  2. Reducing lifeguard expenses via cross training and scheduling efficiencies.

The most successful infusers were:

  1. Hosting of a dive-in movie night and a free swim lesson offering.
  2. Implementing a knowledge campaign.

 

Interview by Bobby Dyer.

Tags: budgetingfeaturedGoal SettingLeadership DevelopmentMITMIT Recreationoperationsplanningstudent development
Previous Post

How Precor Equipment is Meeting Needs

Next Post

Why Change Should be a Constant: Part One

Bobby Dyer

Bobby Dyer

Bobby is a former staff writer at Peake Media.

Related Posts

adult recreational sports leagues
News

Brock University Expands Campus Rec Offerings with Adult Recreational Sports Leagues

April 9, 2026
campus recreation social media strategies
Operations

Campus Recreation Social Media Strategies That Boost Student Engagement

March 25, 2026
Using Campus Rec Assessment Tools to Strengthen Department  Operations
Operations

Using Campus Rec Assessment Tools to Strengthen Department Operations

March 11, 2026
Get in Front of Campus Rec Decision Makers at the 2026 Campus Rec Leadership Summit
News

Get in Front of Campus Rec Decision Makers at the 2026 Campus Rec Leadership Summit

February 10, 2026
How Campus Rec Departments are Preparing for the Spring Semester
Operations

How Campus Rec Departments are Preparing for the Spring Semester

December 29, 2025
campus recreation technology
Operations

Smarter Systems, Stronger Connections: The Growing Role of Technology in Campus Rec

December 22, 2025
Next Post
change

Why Change Should be a Constant: Part One

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Updates in your inbox

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn
Campus Rec Logo

The premier business resource for college and university recreation centers.

The Current Issue

March/April 2026

March/April 2026

Browse

  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • E-Newsletter
  • Podcast
  • Media Kit
  • Contact

© 2026 Campus Rec Magazine. Published by Peake Media.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Sections
    • Columns
    • Facility Development
    • News
    • Operations
    • Programming
    • Rec of the Month
    • Staff Development
    • Well-being
    • Profiles
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Subscribe
    • E-Newsletter
    • Contact Us
  • On-Demand
    • Exclusive Interviews
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
  • Supplier Insights
    • Brand Voice
    • Supplier News
    • Supplier Voice
    • Spotlights
  • Education
    • CR Leadership Summit
    • CR Base Camp
    • Pickleball Innovators
  • Buyer’s Guide

© 2026 Campus Rec Magazine. Published by Peake Media.