• Subscribe
  • E-Newsletter
  • Media Kit
  • Contact
  • Login
Campus Rec Magazine
  • Sections
    • Columns
    • Facility Development
    • News
    • Operations
    • Programming
    • Rec of the Month
    • Staff Development
    • Well-being
    • Profiles
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Subscribe
    • E-Newsletter
    • Contact Us
  • On-Demand
    • Exclusive Interviews
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
  • Supplier Insights
    • Brand Voice
    • Supplier News
    • Supplier Voice
  • Education
    • CR Leadership Summit
    • CR Base Camp
    • Pickleball Innovators
  • Buyer’s Guide
No Result
View All Result
  • Sections
    • Columns
    • Facility Development
    • News
    • Operations
    • Programming
    • Rec of the Month
    • Staff Development
    • Well-being
    • Profiles
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Subscribe
    • E-Newsletter
    • Contact Us
  • On-Demand
    • Exclusive Interviews
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
  • Supplier Insights
    • Brand Voice
    • Supplier News
    • Supplier Voice
  • Education
    • CR Leadership Summit
    • CR Base Camp
    • Pickleball Innovators
  • Buyer’s Guide
No Result
View All Result
Campus Rec Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home Operations

The Pros and Cons of Fitness Service Delivery Protocols

Brittany Todd by Brittany Todd
September 6, 2022
in Columns, Operations
0
Fitness Service Delivery

Image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

As assistant director of Fitness, one of the greatest challenges I face in terms of group fitness and personal training staff development is navigating the fine line between standardizing fitness service delivery practices and allowing space for individual coaching freedom and expression.

When evaluating my staff development procedures, I consistently find myself weighing the cost-benefit of these polarizing approaches.

On one hand, standardization of fitness instructional practices breeds quality control for the operation and patrons. On the other hand, individual expression potentially brings out the best in your staff, and this can trickle down to the member experience.

So which approach yields the greatest success in fitness service delivery?

To answer that question, let’s consider both sides of the coin.

Benefits and Drawbacks

One benefit of standardizing fitness service delivery practices is that fitness area leaders can ensure all members receive a consistent and top-quality fitness experience.

Specifically, members and management can rest assured whether you attend Tina’s 5 p.m. cycling class or Tony’s 7 a.m. Zumba class, you’re going to have an overall positive and professional experience.

In my experience working as a fitness coach in locations with standardized coaching protocols, this high level of standardization added structure and ease for me as I knew exactly what elements I needed to include in each session for success.

EXTRA CREDIT: Strategies to maximize effectiveness in fitness program evaluation.

However, I also found working in these highly standardized locations to be less exciting and engaging long term because I did not have the freedom to explore and try new things with my clients.

In fact, some of my most beautiful fitness moments arose from having the freedom to conduct my sessions exactly as I saw fit.

From a leadership standpoint, fitness service delivery standardization can also be very time consuming and labor intensive to enforce. Managers must constantly evaluate, monitor and reinforce staff to ensure they are successfully staying within your location’s standardized protocols.

But these additional measures can ultimately save time for leadership as you no longer must retroactively resolve the issues that a lack of standardized protocols can invite.

So, this leads us back to the original question: Which approach yields the greatest success in fitness service delivery?

The Solution

In my operation, I’ve found a combination of both approaches to be most impactful.

For best results, I recommend fitness area leaders start by creating a list of their non-negotiables when it comes to fitness service delivery procedures.

Non-negotiables include elements such as safety protocols, communication strategies, brand consistency and class/session formatting structure that must be firmly standardized for greatest impact.

These non-negotiables serve as the concrete elemental boundaries for which your staff cannot omit or adjust when conducting their sessions and classes. This also serves as a consistent standard of evaluation for your staff, regardless of their position as a trainer or instructor.

For example, in my current position as assistant director of Fitness at Florida International University, a general overview of my non-negotiable elements are as follows:

  • Every group fitness class or personal training session must begin with a formal introduction and welcome, an overview of the day’s workout and explanation of any safety information.
  • The session then must transition into a dynamic warmup lasting a minimum of five minutes including movements specific to the workout focus for the day.
  • The main body of the workout must feature music with appropriate content, tempo and volume for environment, population and space.
  • After the main portion of the workout is completed, staff must transition into a cool down lasting a minimum of five minutes.
  • The session or class must conclude with a formal sign off thanking the participant(s) and providing additional post-workout recovery information.

All new hires on my team are trained in-depth on this protocol, and regular staff evaluations are conducted to ensure compliance on these non-negotiable elements.

Final Advice

Once you’ve established your non-negotiables, the space for staff personalization can be identified.

Specifically, everything else related to fitness service delivery that cleanly fits within the boundaries of your non-negotiable elements is open for your staff to incorporate their individuality and creative expression.

For example, if Jenny includes all the non-negotiable elements into her boot camp class, she is free to construct the course delivery according to her best professional judgment. Meaning, she may select her own playlist and develop her own workout with whatever session structure she sees fit.

The most important thing for fitness managers to consider when establishing service delivery protocols is the style of communication the population you serve best responds and what procedural conditions bring out the greatest success in your staff’s performance.

Using this information, managers can tailor their fitness service delivery protocols to best suite everyone’s needs.

 

Tags: campus reccommunicationfeaturedfitnessFlorida International Universityhiringservicesstaffingworkout
Previous Post

The Matrix Wow-Factor at Hardin-Simmons University

Next Post

Texas A&M Rec Sports Opens New Campus Rec Center

Brittany Todd

Brittany Todd

Brittany Todd is the Director of Fitness and Wellness at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University where she oversees the Campus Recreation and Wellness programming on campus. Brittany has over a decade of experience leading in the fitness and wellness. industry working at institutions such as the University of Miami, Florida International University, Creighton University and the College at Brockport. Brittany is also an adjunct professor, and a published author of two books, research studies and editorial articles, as well as an avid presenter at numerous national conferences.

Related Posts

How Campus Rec Departments are Preparing for the Spring Semester
Operations

How Campus Rec Departments are Preparing for the Spring Semester

December 29, 2025
Low-Cost Marketing Trends to Implement in 2026: Part Two
Columns

Low-Cost Marketing Trends to Implement in 2026: Part Two

December 23, 2025
campus recreation technology
Operations

Smarter Systems, Stronger Connections: The Growing Role of Technology in Campus Rec

December 22, 2025
low-cost marketing trends
Columns

Low-Cost Marketing Trends to Implement in 2026: Part One

December 18, 2025
From Metrics to Storytelling: Campus Rec Data Trends Transforming Decision-Making
Operations

From Metrics to Storytelling: Campus Rec Data Trends Transforming Decision-Making

November 24, 2025
coaching student employees
Columns

Coaching Student Staff to Turn Questions Into Problem-Solving Opportunities

October 21, 2025
Next Post
Texas A&M

Texas A&M Rec Sports Opens New Campus Rec Center

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Updates in your inbox

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn
Campus Rec Logo

The premier business resource for college and university recreation centers.

The Current Issue

January/February 2026

January/February 2026

Browse

  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • E-Newsletter
  • Podcast
  • Media Kit
  • Contact

© 2025 Campus Rec Magazine. Published by Peake Media.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Sections
    • Columns
    • Facility Development
    • News
    • Operations
    • Programming
    • Rec of the Month
    • Staff Development
    • Well-being
    • Profiles
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Subscribe
    • E-Newsletter
    • Contact Us
  • On-Demand
    • Exclusive Interviews
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
  • Supplier Insights
    • Brand Voice
    • Supplier News
    • Supplier Voice
  • Education
    • CR Leadership Summit
    • CR Base Camp
    • Pickleball Innovators
  • Buyer’s Guide

© 2025 Campus Rec Magazine. Published by Peake Media.